Who We Are

The Post‑Award Team oversees all central Post‑Award functions and supports faculty and the research community throughout the entire award life cycle. Our team includes Central Research Administrators (CRAs) and Department Research Administrators (DRAs), who provide principal investigators and their staff with daily financial oversight and guidance on the administration of grants.

We manage award setup, ongoing financial administration, and closeout activities. Our goal is to deliver timely, accurate, and courteous service to faculty, external sponsors, and University personnel. We help ensure strong fiscal management of externally funded programs and provide expertise to interpret sponsor and University requirements to maintain full compliance.

During the Post‑Award phase, the Post Award team and academic departments work together to ensure that each award is managed in accordance with the university, school, and sponsor policies. Strong financial and programmatic stewardship is essential to the successful administration of sponsored projects.

Post Award management includes the following members: Principal Investigator (PI) and related team members, Central Research Administrators (CRAs), and Department Research Administrators (DRAs).

  • Track the project’s daily spending
  • Keep an eye on progress toward research goals
  • Know the sponsor’s rules about what can be spent
  • Work with the department to ensure cost‑share is completed and documented
  • Prepare and the final technical report

  • Award Setup: Create new award accounts, enter budgets, and ensure all terms and conditions are correctly applied.
  • Compliance Oversight: Interpret and enforce federal, state, sponsor, and University policies from the notice of awards.
  • Financial Monitoring: Review spending for allowability, allocability, and reasonableness; conduct periodic financial reviews.
  • Reporting: Prepare and submit official progress reports to sponsors.
  • Audits & Closeouts: Assist in audit responses and coordinate formal award closeout.
  • Institutional Authority: Serve as the official point of contact for sponsors on financial and administrative matters.

  • Day-to-Day Award Management: Track spending, monitor budgets, and help faculty understand available balances.
  • Effort & Payroll Support: Assist with effort changes to include payroll costs transfers (PCTs) and salary cap documentation to support charges to the awards.
  • Faculty Support: Assist PIs with interpreting award terms and preparing internal forms.
  • Communication Hub: Serve as the primary point of contact for PIs and staff, relaying guidance from central administration when needed.

Award Management Process

Award Management Process


Advance/Late Spending

Pre-award costs are expenses you spend before the official start date of a grant, to begin the project on time. These costs are only allowed if they would have been allowed after the award begins and if the sponsor gives written approval.

If the full award does not come through, or if the sponsor refuses to pay for any pre-award spending, then the PI’s department or school must cover those costs.

Federal rules (Uniform Guidance §200.308(d)(1)) allow institutions to approve expenses up to 90 days before the award start date, or earlier with federal approval. However, any pre-award spending is done at the institution’s own risk. The sponsor does not have to reimburse these costs if:

  • the award is not issued,
  • the award ends early, or
  • the award amount is lower than expected.

NIH states clearly that spending money before the award is made does not obligate NIH to fund the project or increase the budget if the award comes in lower than anticipated.


Reporting

Annual Progress Reports are mandatory for continued funding and must be submitted accurately and on time. NIH uses the RPPR, with defined timelines (45-60 days pre-budget start). Reports document scientific progress, personnel, copliance, publications, and plans for the next period. CMS requires similar annual or periodic progress reporting.

The RPPR report is due within 9- days of the award end date for most federal grants. Reports range from a summary and list of publications to a complete, exhaustive compliation of the project results. The PI is responsible for submitting all technical reports in the correct form according to the award terms.

 

NIH requires submission fo the final RPPR report via eCommons. The PI logs into eRA Commons and clicks on the status tab at the top of the screen. The PI selects the "Requires Closeout". Once the PI has completed the final reporting electronically, they should route to OSP to provide the institutional approval of the final RPPR report.

Most Sponsors require the university to report any inventions, discoveries, or other novel commercial developments requilting from the funded project. Many federal agencies also require a reqport on preperty dispostition.

Participant Support

Participant support costs are typically allowable only when approved in advance by the funding agency. These costs may include stipends or subsistence, travel, and registration fees paid to or on behalf of participants or trainees but may not be charged for employees.

All participant support costs should be explicitly included in the budget or receive sponsor approval after the award has been issued.

 

A participant is an individual who is the recipient-not the provider-of training associated with a workshop, conference, seminar, symposium, or other short-tem instructional or information-sharing activity. Participants are not expencted to produce deliverables or provide services to the University.

Participant Support Costs (PSC) include expenditure on items such as the following:

  • Stipends: A stipend is a fixed amount paid directly to a participant in connection with a training or educational activity.
  • Travel: Allowable travel costs include transportation and related expenses. All travel must comply with federal sponsored travel regulations as well as UNT Health travel policies and guidelines.
  • Subsistence Allowance: Reasonable costs for a participant’s lodging and per diem expenses may be charged when necessary for participation in a conference or training activity and must be limited to the days of attendance. Registration fees are allowable when required for conference participation.
  • Fees: Fees paid by or on behalf of participants for meetings, conferences, symposia, or training activities are generally allowable PSC expenditures.
  • Other Costs: Additional expenses that directly support a participant’s involvement may be allowable, such as training materials or laboratory supplies that can be specifically associated with individual participants.

Common unallowable expenses under the Participant/Trainee Support Budget include (note: some of these costs may be allowable on the main award):

  • Incentives, prizes, memorabilia, or gifts, unless expressly identified, justified in the budget justification, and approved by the sponsor
  • Honoraria or fees paid to guest speakers or lecturers
  • Conference or workshop support costs, including facility rental, catering, supplies, or audiovisual/media equipment rental
  • Payments to human subjects for participation in research activities
  • Expenses incurred by the PI or project staff
  • Costs for collaborators to travel to a single location to discuss project progress or direction
  • Expenses for collaborators to attend project meetings, conferences, or seminars

Carryovers

Carryovers are unspent funds left at the end of a budget period that may be moved into the next budget period for use. Whether funds can be carried over automatically depends on the sponsor’s terms and conditions in the award.

Some sponsors allow automatic carryover. Others require prior approval. When prior approval is required, the request must be submitted in writing to OSP, before any changes are made, so OSP can send the request to the sponsor for a decision.

All carryover requests must be submitted by an authorized OSP official to the sponsor.


No Cost Extension (NCE)

An NCE extends the project period without awarding new funds and is used when additional time—but not additional budget—is needed to meet scientific aims.

Important: Unspent funds alone do not justify an extension


Closeout

Our staff develops, prepares, and maintains the timely closeout of progress reports and other applicable items that accurately represent closing out an award with a sponsor. We ensure prompt reconciliations, justifications, program income (if applicable) and all other facets involved in the accurate reporting of a sponsored project.

The closeout is a critical piece in the life cycle of a grant. Preparation for closeout should begin three months prior to the expiration date of the grant to accurately forecast expenses and any adjusting financial entries. Closeouts generally require the submission of final reports to the sponsor within 90-120 days of the grant ending.


PI Transfer (Out)

The Post Award CRAs will contact the sponsor and send an official letter/email to relinquish the award in the applicable system.

If the award will remain at UNT Health and the PI is leaving, the Chair and Dean—working with the PI—will recommend a new PI to the sponsor. Post Award CRAs will then submit the request for sponsor approval. If approved, OSP will receive approval from the sponsor naming the new PI.

To submit the request, we need the following:

  • A statement from the PI/Chair/Dean explaining why the award should stay and why the proposed PI is qualified to continue the project.
  • The biographical sketch of the proposed new PI.
  • The new PI’s current and pending support.
  • Any budget or cost center changes related to the PI change.
  • If applicable, any change in level of effort (a 25% or greater reduction must be reported).

Meet Our Team

placeholder
Bridgette Larkin-Perkins, Director

 

FAQ

The GNR is emailed after the award is set up. This email will provide the chart of accounts along with detailed instructions on the net steps for the PI and departments.

An award is typically setup within 3 business days after receipt of request and administrative approvals to include a new research agreement.

Principal Investigators (PIs) may request authorization to spend funds in support of a sponsored program in advance of receiving a notive of an award from a sponsor when allowable by the sponsor. The awarding agency is under no obligation to reimburse such costs if for any reason the University does not receive an award of if the award is delayed or is less than the anticipated and inadequate to cover such costs.

A financial conflict of interest happens when the institution decides that an investigator’s significant financial interest (SFI) could influence how research is designed, carried out, or reported.The institution must review every SFI disclosure to decide whether the SFI:

  • is connected to the funded research (for example, the research could affect the value of the SFI, or the SFI is with a company that could be affected by the research), and
  • could directly and meaningfully influence the design, conduct, or reporting of the research.